Welcome to Prepare4mba! If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. If you have any suggestions / feedback on the content of this site, please put you comments at the bottom of this page. This blog posts information and tips for cracking GMAT. Go ahead, subscribe to the feed by entering your email and a click of a button. You can find a subscription form on the right hand side!!!

Google

Tuesday 26 June, 2007

1000sc-463

463. Judicial rules in many states require that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut the testimony, but the Constitution explicitly requires only that the defendant have the opportunity to confront an accuser in court.

(A) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses are made known to defendants so they can attempt to rebut

(B) that the identities of all prosecution witnesses be made known to defendants so that they can attempt to rebut

(C) that the defendants should know the identities of all prosecution witnesses so they can attempt a rebuttal of

(D) the identities of all prosecution witnesses should be made known to defendants so they can attempt rebutting

(E) making known to defendants the identities of all prosecution witnesses so that they can attempt to rebut





previous Official Answer Next

No comments: